#firefox doesn't need to be remotely as big as Chrome or as IE was before Chrome... It just needs to be big enough to matter in privacy and open standards and to keep the other browser makers honest.
But this is a troubling loss of the only mainstream browser not owned by a major advertiser or tech giant.
The internet is a much better place if Firefox can claw its way back to 10-15 percent market share.
It's now hovering at around 8 percent with Chrome at 70+%....
@tchambers 46 million... lord... that pretty much it's an unannounced sentence of death.
I stopped using Firefox because it's almost unusable on a Raspberry Pi 4, Chromium is just much better.
Firefox is currently getting drowned out largely because other browsers are defaults on hardware. Perhaps the Steam Deck has a chance to spread that advantage around a little bit.
@tchambers Firefox is at a huge disadvantage today:
1. It doesn't own a platform where it can be the default web browser (or set policies preventing other browsers from running).
2. Since it doesn't own platforms, it also can't market as effectively or as aggressively.
@cadadr It certainly doesn't help when people feel betrayed by Mozilla or Firefox. But I'm not convinced that explains their declining market share. Their decline in market share began with the introduction of Chrome, which Google heavily marketed through their search engine and other places. It's been going on a while:
There's also this video, which goes further back in time:
@cstanhope That's a fact but I think that's only part why. In the video you can notice a plateau about 2017 and then a quick fall again. The graph in the other link doesn't reflect this but in my experience from interacting with people there was that plateau somewhere, and it corresponds with the addonocide mainly (FF57).
I'd say in an alternate timeline w/o quantum, "studies", Firefox OS, Pocket, and if Mozilla was more selective towards web standards and focused better on what made FF unique and on FF for Android, that number may have stayed ~15%-20%.
@cadadr Possibly. I'm pretty sure you're right about them shedding a chunk of users right around the time they changed up the extension mechanism. It's a shame since, from what I read, it was necessary for them to be able to maintain Firefox moving forward.
I was a fan of FirefoxOS, and it was a bold move, but I admit in hindsight that it was probably a poor direction for them to take given their limited resources.
@cstanhope all true. It tried to own low end smartphones and frankly that cost them in focus and innovation everywhere else.
@tchambers 8% is generous, I've mostly seen ~5%. I basically don't see a way for Mozilla to get out of the spiral at this point; weird thinking about that when back in high school I was all "I wanna work for Mozilla"
musing on how mozilla could survive
@tchambers At this point I think literally the only thing that would work is simultaneous antitrust action against Microsoft and Google requiring them to debundle, spin off their browsers, and pay enormous monetary damages to Mozilla and Apple for the purpose of catching the other browser engines up.
@tchambers This has been brewing for a while, I think Mozilla themselves lost a lot of focus in the last decade. They'll get it together, a lot of good people there.
@tchambers "Mozilla’s browser exploded onto the scene in 2002 with the explicit intention of disrupting the monopoly Safari and Chrome had long enjoyed"
uhhh is this some kind of Mandela Effect thing? that's not the 2002 I remember.
@MatejLach Agreed that Mozilla should do more faster and differentiate itself from Chrome and Safari on privacy….on every front you mentioned…
Personally I am done with mozilla.
They implement the most ridiculous standards like vr plus i have to spent a good 3 hours removing spying when i install it. Not worth it anymore.
Plus the ceo pay scandal.
INDIEWEB.SOCIAL is an instance focused on the #Openeb, #Indieweb, #Fediverse, #Mastodon #Selfsovereign #identity (#SSI), #Humanetech and #Calm technologies evolution.